Username: Password:

Author Topic: Throbak pickups  (Read 11230 times)

richard

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 821
Throbak pickups
« on: May 17, 2011, 08:13:22 PM »
Anyone come across these ? Makes very interesting reading.

http://gundrymedia.typepad.com/throbak_electronics/

PRS Bernie Marsden Abraxas set
PRS S2 Singlecut RY's
JV Strat  IT Bridge
Gibson SG JB bridge
Fender Mex Tele Thinline TV Jones Classics
Fender Bassbreaker 15
Yamaha THR 100 Dual
Quilter Aviator Cub

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Re: Throbak pickups
« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2011, 09:46:14 PM »
I believe Twinfan has (or had) a set or two.
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Re: Throbak pickups
« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2011, 11:08:41 PM »
Yep, I've had a couple of sets.

Keven

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 731
Re: Throbak pickups
« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2011, 11:31:33 PM »
wow. pretty expensive i'd rather pay for BKP at this point!
My BK's:
Black Dog8-Riff Raff8 / Black Dog7-Mule7
C-Bomb Set / Blackhawk Bridge
Holydiver Set/ BG50 Set

richard

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 821
Re: Throbak pickups
« Reply #4 on: May 18, 2011, 12:54:03 AM »
Twinfan, you've 'had' a couple of sets ? You don't have them any more ? What did you think of them and how did they compare to BKs ?
PRS Bernie Marsden Abraxas set
PRS S2 Singlecut RY's
JV Strat  IT Bridge
Gibson SG JB bridge
Fender Mex Tele Thinline TV Jones Classics
Fender Bassbreaker 15
Yamaha THR 100 Dual
Quilter Aviator Cub

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Re: Throbak pickups
« Reply #5 on: May 18, 2011, 09:21:44 AM »
I'm well aware that this is the BKP site, and out of respect for Tim and the boys I'll keep this brief.

I personally prefer Throbaks to every other PAF type I've tried (BKP, DiMarzio, Bulldog, Seymour Duncan, ToneRider, PRS etc).  The first set of Throbaks I had were too 'soft' sounding for me, so I sold them and bought a rockier set.  They were then sold with the old '65 SG they were fitted in, but I wish I'd kept them.

richard

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 821
Re: Throbak pickups
« Reply #6 on: May 18, 2011, 08:36:13 PM »
Twinfan, a fair comment respectfully made.  I guess you have to take into account that Throbak make ONLY PAFalikes and that they're very expensive.  What interested me was his point that early PAFS were scatterwound when SD totally denies it and states that you should NEVER scatterwind a humbucker. It's is interesting to read the widely differing opinions about the old PAFs and how they were made.
PRS Bernie Marsden Abraxas set
PRS S2 Singlecut RY's
JV Strat  IT Bridge
Gibson SG JB bridge
Fender Mex Tele Thinline TV Jones Classics
Fender Bassbreaker 15
Yamaha THR 100 Dual
Quilter Aviator Cub

MDV

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945
  • If it sounds good it IS good
Re: Throbak pickups
« Reply #7 on: May 18, 2011, 09:06:27 PM »
Twinfan, a fair comment respectfully made.  I guess you have to take into account that Throbak make ONLY PAFalikes and that they're very expensive.  What interested me was his point that early PAFS were scatterwound when SD totally denies it and states that you should NEVER scatterwind a humbucker. It's is interesting to read the widely differing opinions about the old PAFs and how they were made.

This came up in a chat with tim a while back, how they were made that is. My memory might be a bit hazy, so bear in mind this is tims info attentuated by several years, but he had some very interesting insights on the matter (unsurprisingly)

Basically, they were made as cheaply as possible and quite inconsistently, and there were some very happy accidents.

A lot of/most of (maybe all of; I'm not clear on this part) of the early PAFs were made by immigrant labour, often women (though thats of no relevance), sitting all day winding bobbins, one coil at a time under loose guidance as to how. I dont know if they were told to make any particular scatterwinding pattern (though scatterwinding patterns vary from pickup to pickup the basic method is fairly similar all the time, as I understand it - though I'm not sure how close to 'proprietary' that method is so I'll leave it out).

The important parts are these: 1. winding style varied a lot from person to person 2. All the people winding thew the coils into one big bucket 3. The coils were then assembled into humbuckers later, by different poeple. The pickups were not made one at a time in a dedicated fashion by a single individuall; only the coils were.

This meant that different winds and different numbers of turns were combined in the pickups, and old pafs had offset coils as a major and common feature in their 'design' and lots of different combinations of hand-wound coils (note offset winds are a major design feature in BKs; all but a couple have some offset). No doubt the winders were very good at winding, but from winder to winder they werent consistent, and any given winder quite probably varied their patterns too (probably out of shear bordom; they werent doing it for love of tone, remember), so there was a lot of mismatching. Plus handwinding always has innate innacuracies compared to machine winding that will always be somewhere between ideally scatterwound (minimal paralel turns, larger spaces between winds, lower distributed capacitace, higher, broader top end response) and perfectly machine wound (all parallel turns), so certainly there will have been some degree of 'scatterwoundness' in all of them whether by design or not, and the amount of 'scatteroundness' would vary from coil to coil.

That means that there was no definite original paf sound. The manufacturing process couldnt produce it. There were good and cr@p sounding pafs and all points in between. Some good ones were chosen in/for guitars by players that became popular and so we came to hear a certain set of sounds made by pafs, chosen by the human ear, and those sounds were distilled into our various ideas as to what a paf absolutely sounds like. They were actually much, much more variable than that.

Tim (and no doubt others, quite possibly throbak too; I have no idea about their methodology or history, or their view of the methodlogies or history of pickup making; what history they heard about it, or believe to be true) spent years researching and picking apart old pafs that sounded good (an acceptable sacrifice, surely?) and figuring out what combination of elements were bought together by chance in the pickups that sounded good and performed well, and then intentionally and consistenly reproducing it, and using the common characteristics to inform new designs.

Its kinda like evolution actually! The random combination of randomly wound coils is equivelent to genetic mutation; and engine for unguided variation, and they all encouter the human ear, and the best sounding designs survive.

If Tim or some other chap at BK that actually knows this history stumbles across this; sorry for all the mistakes I no doubt made :lol:
« Last Edit: May 18, 2011, 09:10:13 PM by MDV »

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Re: Throbak pickups
« Reply #8 on: May 18, 2011, 09:15:02 PM »
Good anecdote Mark, and it just makes total sense that that vintage "magic" was at least partly due to happy accidents.  :D

BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

HTH AMPS

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5649
    • HTH AMPS
Re: Throbak pickups
« Reply #9 on: May 18, 2011, 09:24:03 PM »
This sounds like an opportunity for Tim to have some cheap BKPs made by people on minimum wage who have little idea about winding pickups - just leave it to chance.  They'd be accurate PAFs then  :roll:  :lol:

The whole PAF thing is OLD, I'm sick of it - its what everyone is chasing and its boring.  There are plenty of great sounding pickups that don't necessarily have the strict 'tone ingredients' but sound amazing.  The Abraxas set springs to mind.  I'm also digging the Cold Sweat neck (giving the Abraxas neck a break for a while). 

Its heartening that Tim is pushing boundaries all the time with stuff like the Aftermath. 

 


Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Re: Throbak pickups
« Reply #10 on: May 18, 2011, 09:24:48 PM »
Yep, there's no "right" PAF.  Too many flavours.

I've mentioned on here quite a few times that the particular BKP flavour of PAF in the Mule didn't suit me in a couple of guitars, but I'm definitely in the minority in that regard.  The only thing you can do is try the flavours yourself and make your own mind up  :)

MDV

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945
  • If it sounds good it IS good
Re: Throbak pickups
« Reply #11 on: May 18, 2011, 09:44:05 PM »
Just read the throbak thing...I dont know, maybe memory screwed me over somehow. They cant have been all machine wound on a leesona 102 and all handmade by cheap labour. I find it hard to believe that I or tim could just dream up such a story, though (or that the throwback guy could). Pass. Dont care anyway. My pickups these days are 1/2 aftermaths 1/2 *ahem* battery powered; I care not a jot personally for old school....well, anything really. Just though some people might find the 'development', if you can call it that, story interesting. I expected I'd remember a few things wrong, but I hope its not that misleading  :oops:

ericsabbath

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4702
    • Colidium
Re: Throbak pickups
« Reply #12 on: May 19, 2011, 02:47:34 AM »
oh man, I love all the PAF yadda yadda

now that this is all cleared up, how do I get EVH's tone?








I mean... seriously...












:lol:
Riff Raff, Mules, Black Dog, VHII's, Cold Sweat

richard

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 821
Re: Throbak pickups
« Reply #13 on: May 19, 2011, 07:52:12 AM »
Eric, go to the SD forum. This is one subject they NEVER tire of.
PRS Bernie Marsden Abraxas set
PRS S2 Singlecut RY's
JV Strat  IT Bridge
Gibson SG JB bridge
Fender Mex Tele Thinline TV Jones Classics
Fender Bassbreaker 15
Yamaha THR 100 Dual
Quilter Aviator Cub

Elliot

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2418
Re: Throbak pickups
« Reply #14 on: May 19, 2011, 08:34:51 AM »
I thought it was accepted now that Gibson didn't have a team of mexican ladies hand scatterwinding pickups (as Fender did, and anyway Gibson's factory was in Kalamazoo, Michigan, so the immigrants would be Germans?) but made their pickups on Leesona 102s.  Given the Leesonas predated the PAF (i.e. for P90s) the idea they got a load of immigrants in to make them doesn't quite work).  The appearance of scatterwinding is due to the fact that the Leesonas were pretty clunky and that the machinery created a level of randomness between pickups that modern winders don't have.   

Personally I don't care - Scatterwound PAF replicas sound pretty damn good to me and, in particular, the PG Blues, Mules and Stormies all have the mojo.
BKPS: Milks, P90s, Apaches, Mississippi Queens, Mules, PG Blues, BG FP 50s, e.60s strat custom set