i imagine if this customer could have got doug to agree to a blackmachine build that is what he would have had instead
I must have been asked to do it 5 times in the last year as a british builder who also does the odd fanned fret guitar, and i have always turned it down as not really my thing (i.e. i know someone does it a lot better)
if i had to rely on guitar building to eat i am not sure i could afford to be so picky
I stole the bridge idea for the fanned frets, was quite open about it too. after building one with ABM's single saddles and feeling like my rear end was a bit sore.... well dougs idea of an ebony plate and wilkinson/graphtech saddles made a lot of sense!
this guitar is not a clone... it does not have any distinguishing blackmachine features apart from the headstock shape. you could argue that its a fanned fret super strat but i dont think doug would claim ownership of those ideas. its not super thin either.
its not going to deny doug any income, people who want a blackmachine and have the money for one will still struggle to get one!
i completely agree that the headstock rip off is bad form, the rest is just down to having customers that say"can you do me a black machine style build?"
i am not sure it is any different to copying a vintage fender or gibson... the blackmachine style is very distinctive and whilst it may be new its still very recognisable.... and more importantly, people want it, they ask for it, and if they ask enough people someone will build it
here is another builder who shows a lot of blackmachine influence (though, if you ask him he would say not)
http://www.hufschmidguitars.com/8strings.cfmhow about jaden rose building the similar style, but more carved???? is that bad form too?
the superthin superstrat idea is here to stay, and unfortunately i dont think doug will be able to fill that market anytime soon... but you can be sure peoipel will reference his name when its done