Username: Password:

Author Topic: **Attn Wireless Users**  (Read 4482 times)

llJasonll

  • Guest
**Attn Wireless Users**
« on: November 08, 2011, 01:42:34 AM »
I am deciding to go Wireless, and I need some help!

After years of being afraid to run around the stage, for fear of unplugging myself, I have decided to throw my cables to the curb.

I am a complete noob with wireless systems, as I was always a tone purist.  I am (hopefully) assuming that the technology has come a ways in the past 10-15 years and I can get a system that doesn't hinder my tone for not too much $$$.

I was looking at any of the Line 6 G30-G90 series.  It seems the G50 might be the best bang for my buck, but I am reading that the G90 sounds like using a cable.

Ideas? Suggestions?? Any help would be much appreciated!

HTH AMPS

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5649
    • HTH AMPS
Re: **Attn Wireless Users**
« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2011, 02:25:08 AM »
I'm using an AKG WMS40 and can't say I have any issue with my tone - best its ever been in fact.

You can pick these up for under £150 new.  I'm sure there are 'better' systems, but this one works just fine.


Sancho

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 540
Re: **Attn Wireless Users**
« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2011, 05:54:18 AM »
I agree on the AKG. Good tone, good functionality and the fact it doesn't use 9v batteries makes it more affordable to run.
Hey Nonny Nonny mylord!

sgmypod

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3765
  • Truly bad since 1972
Re: **Attn Wireless Users**
« Reply #3 on: November 08, 2011, 01:12:59 PM »
I use the akg ones as well
Autotune My Arse

Crawler,nailbomb & Ltd Ed Emeralds, apache, now riff raff..EX- N/bomb, IT, Mquee

llJasonll

  • Guest
Re: **Attn Wireless Users**
« Reply #4 on: November 09, 2011, 02:46:54 AM »
Oh cool, so those are cheaper than I thought!

Digital Signal is supposed to be better, is there any truth to the claim??

Denim n Leather

  • Guest
Re: **Attn Wireless Users**
« Reply #5 on: November 09, 2011, 02:56:26 AM »
Oh cool, so those are cheaper than I thought!

Digital Signal is supposed to be better, is there any truth to the claim??
No.

Denim n Leather

  • Guest
Re: **Attn Wireless Users**
« Reply #6 on: November 09, 2011, 02:57:35 AM »
I agree on the AKG. Good tone, good functionality and the fact it doesn't use 9v batteries makes it more affordable to run.
It does thin the tone out a bit, tho. I have the WMS80 and even at something like $700 or whatever it cost, it still noticeably affects the tone. I have since gone back to wired ...

llJasonll

  • Guest
Re: **Attn Wireless Users**
« Reply #7 on: November 09, 2011, 05:04:20 AM »
Hmm that sucks.  I suppose I pay a price for freedom of movement on stage...

Sancho

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 540
Re: **Attn Wireless Users**
« Reply #8 on: November 09, 2011, 08:00:54 AM »
No wireless sounds the same as a good cable, I have to agree.
But the loss with the AKG is a lot less than the loss I experienced with my Nady. It takes some balancing between the transmitter output and receiver input gain, but it can be made to sound close enough to a cable for me not to care. I wouldn't use it in the studio, obviously, but when you're on a stage big enough to justify using a wireless there's plenty of other factors messing with your tone anyway.
Hey Nonny Nonny mylord!

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Re: **Attn Wireless Users**
« Reply #9 on: November 09, 2011, 07:00:18 PM »
I've used a Sennheiser Freeport for over 5 years and it's been faultless.  Can't recommend it highly enough.  No major tone difference as far as I can hear and I've got pretty good ears...

d1dsj

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1010
Re: **Attn Wireless Users**
« Reply #10 on: November 09, 2011, 07:03:49 PM »
We have 4 Sennheiser G2 systems in our band and not 1 problem in 4 years of regular use.

HTH AMPS

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5649
    • HTH AMPS
Re: **Attn Wireless Users**
« Reply #11 on: November 09, 2011, 07:29:59 PM »
The thinning of the tone is an issue if you don't set the gains of the transmitter and receiver correctly - if you max them it does thin the tone, but there is a sweet spot where its not an issue.  I'm picky as hell with my tone and if there was a big impact on the tone, I'd be using a lead again.  As it happens, I actually like my tone better with the wireless, its chunkier if anything - plus there is no risk of getting zapped off dodgy PA's since you're isolated from your amp's ground circuit completely with a wireless.




sgmypod

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3765
  • Truly bad since 1972
Re: **Attn Wireless Users**
« Reply #12 on: November 10, 2011, 10:45:52 PM »
also in the band mix even if it was (slightly different tone, I say was) would it be noticable. I have never noticed difference and I am funny about my tone
Autotune My Arse

Crawler,nailbomb & Ltd Ed Emeralds, apache, now riff raff..EX- N/bomb, IT, Mquee

Ratrod

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5264
Re: **Attn Wireless Users**
« Reply #13 on: November 11, 2011, 04:57:54 PM »
I just got a secondhand Nady wireless system.

I'm actually amazed by how good it still sounds. I can hear the difference in quality between my Spectraflex cable and the wireless but I doubt anyone in the audience would notice.

I haven't tested it in a live stuation though.
BKP user since 2004: early 7K Blackguard 50

llJasonll

  • Guest
Re: **Attn Wireless Users**
« Reply #14 on: November 11, 2011, 08:51:38 PM »
Awesome.  Thanks for the replies!

I think I have enough info, along with what was on harmony central, to make a good decision.

Thanks, again!