I doubt it'll be too bright in a Standard 24, the all-mahogany construction will make quite a difference.
FWIW, I'll be putting Cold Sweats in my Standard 22, the bridge is (probably) at least as bright as the Emerald bridge.
Actually, I already tried a bridge CS in my PRS. The top wasn't to bright but it was too scooped. However, I doubt that the CS is brighter than an Emerald, even though the tone chart on the site says so. I asked Tim how a CS and a Mule would compare in terms of brightness. Tim said that "
The Mule would be considerably brighter than a Cold Sweat." Hmmm.... even though the tone chart shows the CS to be brighter?!? That leads me to belive that the charts aren't that useful if your comparing a contemporary and a vintage output pickup. Which, honestly, can be very confusing. So, the Emerald, being a vintage hot pickup, is probably brighter than a CS. This is all just speculation though :)
I wish I could give you more detail but it was electronics so Tim spoke and I glazed over :? If I had more time I'd have investigated it further but my holiday means I'm on a tight timeline to return this thing and I reason it was always a close call between the Emerald and Holydiver anyway so I'm not that bothered.
No sweat man! I think you'll be very happy with the Holydiver and that's all that matters when you're spending big bucks on gear. It should mix well with your guitar's construction and woods.
Enjoy your holiday! :D
P.S.: I can still expect a detailed review of the neck Emerald, right? 8)