This will undoubtedly be the longest post I have ever made on this forum. I regret that it will also be my last. No, I do NOT have an issue with Twinfan or anyone else on this forum.
I have a massive issue with Paul Reed Smith.
This post ...
I really can't stop looking at that guitar. Will the guitar be kept in a case or are you gonna play her?
... says everything.
Yes, the guitar looks very pretty.
But I don't believe it is worthy of being called a guitar. Guitars are tools, they're made to be played. Otherwise what use are they?
Until PRS came along with their guitars which were never designed to be played the answer would have been "no use at all". Now we have PRS and the answer is "for cynical investment purposes, to lock in a bank vault and for occasional looking at".
A very expensive glass hammer. An investment opportunity. But not a guitar.
So yes, it's a very pretty thing, it has been produced on the very highest quality CNC lathes and it will probably sound good if you ever dare to play it. It's just not a guitar. It's a sculpture of a guitar built never to be played, marketed at accountants, an artificial "vintage guitar" for polishing and looking at.
THIS is a guitar. I get more questions about that video than any other and more compliments about the tone of the guitar than you'd believe.
And it cost me £70. And I gave it away. But in the meantime I quite enjoyed playing it. And I never polished it once.