The Aftermath isn't just a low end that responds quickly, its character is pretty unique. I guess I just don't get lumping in every pickup that's tight in a "fake EMG" category.
It's inevitable as the EMG81 is the benchmark for tightness and if anything is marketed as being tight or the tightest pickup on the market as the AM was hyped to be it will be compared and people will realise it's not as tight and dismiss it as a poor imitator of that specific quality
The way I always saw it it was not advertised as the tightest PU, but rather the tightest passive PU. To dismiss it as a poor imitator to me is also not a good way of saying it. That would make every PU a poor imitator of the EMG tighness, which is just not something fair to say. It puts the PU down despite all the other qualitys and additionally it is not that it does a poor job on the tightness, for a passive it is pretty darn great, too much for a lot of people.
Trying to find an analogy here I might say you are putting down a regular car for for being advertised as environment friendly cause it uses little fuel and has good filtering, putting out far less harmfull stuff than every other mass produced car. Now you are calling it a poor imitator cause there are electric cars.
I never said it was a poor imitator of an emg81. I said that specific quality is a poor imitation if you are looking for tightness.
I also never said it was advertised as the tightest pickup on the market but it was hyped as the tightest. Bad wording on my part there.
And to many the car analogy would actually be seen as poor imitation.
Also bad wording on my side, I was not meaning to say it is a poor imitation of the EMG all in all, I also was just talking about the tightness.
On the car things I would not call it an imitation as it is getting out more than anything else from a technique. That it is surpassed in that quality by a newer technique does not make it an imitation, as it was there before and is just optimizing.
Same with the PUs, the passive was there before the active. Just because someone is optimizing the older form does not mean he is imitating the newer form. To me that makes little sense.
By the same logic I think you could say (trying to push it to the extreme) realistic paintings are a poor imitation of photographs.