Username: Password:

Author Topic: Painkiller, Miracle Man & Holy Diver riffage comparison  (Read 15321 times)

Antag

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2071
Painkiller, Miracle Man & Holy Diver riffage comparison
« on: February 08, 2007, 06:02:03 PM »
OK, there were a few requests for Painkiller riffage from my review in the pickups forum so here is a brief clip I threw together.  For comparison I also recorded the same riff with a Miracle Man & Holy Diver.

I'm kinda hesitant to post these, because after getting them to the PC they sound almost identical :oops:  FWIW, any differences you can hear between the 3 guitars here are a fraction of the differences to my ear while I was actually in the room playing them :roll: :lol: I guess a proper shoot-out would include cleans where the differences are possibly more pronounced.

Here they are anyway:
BKPs: HD, MM, NB, PK, CS, Ab (b&n); Am (b only); VHII, Tril (n only); IT, Slow, Sult (m&n)

Antag

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2071
Painkiller, Miracle Man & Holy Diver riffage comparison
« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2007, 06:04:22 PM »
oops, almost forgot - Gear:

Charvel model 5 (Painkiller)
Gibson Flying V (Miracle Man)
Jackson RR1T (Holy Diver)

Mesa Rect-o-verb 50w head
Mesa 2x12" (Vintage 30s)
Sennheiser E906
BKPs: HD, MM, NB, PK, CS, Ab (b&n); Am (b only); VHII, Tril (n only); IT, Slow, Sult (m&n)

Crazy_Joe

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3940
Painkiller, Miracle Man & Holy Diver riffage comparison
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2007, 06:37:45 PM »
Sounds awesome again, huge sound!
Black Dogs

Previous BKP's: Riff Raff, Holy Divers, Painkillers, C. Warpig, Nailbomb, Miracle Man.

zigmund

  • Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 76
Painkiller, Miracle Man & Holy Diver riffage comparison
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2007, 07:21:32 PM »
Yep, I've been following your other thread with interest.
 Monsta sound!
 I see why you were a little hesitant to post...but I'd say you're on the money for doing so, as these sort of applications are just where the pups would be used. Thanks too for reducing the variables by doing the same riffage for each clip.
   As you say, not much in it to some ears...but hey, we're fussy guys about our sound and like to get it just so:
  They're all meaty, beaty, big and bouncy:
Number 1: seems to have the most bottom, just. Fine but perhaps a merest tad of flab at the uber-low end?
Number 2: seems clearer and springier somehow...thus more ideal in a slightly different setting. Nice balance over the registers than 1.
Number: my fave actually...seems even slightly "larger" in all respects than the others. Bass register is vast(yum!) but controlled, lovely titanic middles and the right amount of warmth to the highs too.
 I'm not sure of the woods of your guitars and how this affects the play of each pup, but they all sound a decent match to me.
 Nice amp Antag! I'm very fond of V30s.
  Good one buddy!

MDV

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945
  • If it sounds good it IS good
Painkiller, Miracle Man & Holy Diver riffage comparison
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2007, 08:09:04 PM »
I agree, the differnces were really marginal, but I thought:

1: snappier and tighter
2: more compressed, smoother, most lows
3: thinner, more open

I found the single track right at the start most helpfull for comparison: the double tracking of heavily distorted guitars sounds good and is fun, but tends to level out differences IMO.

dave_mc

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 9796
Painkiller, Miracle Man & Holy Diver riffage comparison
« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2007, 10:18:19 PM »
heh, yeah, pretty marginal- though the PK sounded the most different, I thought.

HD a little more organic and low mids

MM a little less organic, more bass, little more chug.

PK a bit more metal again than the MM, little less chug.

I think.

dave_mc

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 9796
Painkiller, Miracle Man & Holy Diver riffage comparison
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2007, 10:19:01 PM »
Quote from: MDV
I found the single track right at the start most helpfull for comparison: the double tracking of heavily distorted guitars sounds good and is fun, but tends to level out differences IMO.


+1... but thanks for the clips, it's great to have ones played through the same gear.

:drink:

Muso

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 533
Painkiller, Miracle Man & Holy Diver riffage comparison
« Reply #7 on: February 08, 2007, 10:48:10 PM »
The differences were very marginal to my ears, but I definately prefered the Holy Diver one the best.

Miracle Man seems to have a lot of Low end to it

PainKiller sounds like it makes the sound breakup a bit and it quite dark

Holy Diver is the tightest with a more cleaner tone to it, more mids

Eric

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 246
Painkiller, Miracle Man & Holy Diver riffage comparison
« Reply #8 on: February 08, 2007, 11:15:51 PM »
Thanks for doing this.

To my ears the PK was uber-aggresive. The MM was drier and slightly less intense. The HD sound the least aggresive thinner than the other two. But given the company it was in that is hardly an insult.

ericsabbath

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4702
    • Colidium
Painkiller, Miracle Man & Holy Diver riffage comparison
« Reply #9 on: February 09, 2007, 06:51:08 AM »
they all sounded so great... ;~
i think MM sounded thicker on bottom because it's in a mahogany gibson flying v (very bassy guitar)
everytime Antag records a clip he makes me more confused :s
Riff Raff, Mules, Black Dog, VHII's, Cold Sweat

zigmund

  • Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 76
Painkiller, Miracle Man & Holy Diver riffage comparison
« Reply #10 on: February 09, 2007, 09:24:32 AM »
Ah...shoulda realised about the mahogany in the V; I'm assuming at least one of the others is basswood? Yes, I'm sure that skews things a bit.

Antag

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2071
Painkiller, Miracle Man & Holy Diver riffage comparison
« Reply #11 on: February 09, 2007, 12:10:22 PM »
Thanks for the comments guys, after coming back today & listening with fresh ears there are differences so perhaps it wasn't a totally wasted effort :)

For sure it wasn't a strictly scientific test as the 3 guitars are so different, but then these clips & my "first impressions" posts are about how they sound in my guitars.  A few words about the 3 guitars I used here:

Charvel (PK) - maple neck-thru/rosewood fretboard, poplar body wings (if they're alder then it's a very dense piece of it), schaller floyd.  This guitar weighs a ton & acoustically is the bassiest of the 3 with the most sustain & a thick dense tone, despite the woods & having a floyd.

Flying V (MM) - mahogany set neck/rosewood fretboard, mahogany body, tunomatic w/tailpiece.  Quite light by Gibson standards with a vibrant, snappy sound.  Acoustically it's the loudest electric I own (if that makes sense!)

Jackson (HD) - maple neck-thru/ebony fretboard, alder body wings, tunomatic w/string-thru ferrules.  By far the lightest weight of the 3 guitars & the brightest acoustic sound too.  See this earlier thread about what the HD did for this guitar :)

So, perhaps some of these guitars have qualities that are offset by the pickup I've installed - i.e. it's not necessarily bassiest pickup in bassiest guitar & vice versa.  Adding a Holy Diver clip was an afterthought, it's the odd one out with an Alnico V magnet, but I wanted to show that it is very much a metal pickup that can do this kind of stuff.

FWIW, the Holy Diver is still my favourite BKP - it's a bit more "open" than MM or PK, I love its lead tone & IMO it's miles ahead of MM or PK for clean sounds.  But if you mostly play the kind of riffing I've played here, then you won't go wrong with either MM or PK...
BKPs: HD, MM, NB, PK, CS, Ab (b&n); Am (b only); VHII, Tril (n only); IT, Slow, Sult (m&n)

Ratrod

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5264
Painkiller, Miracle Man & Holy Diver riffage comparison
« Reply #12 on: February 09, 2007, 06:41:20 PM »
Subtle differences, I think. The Holy Diver sounded different than I would have thought but I liked it alot. It's more meaty than I thought.

Holy Diver: Punch in the gut.

Miracle Man: Kick in the nuts.

Painkiller: head butt.
BKP user since 2004: early 7K Blackguard 50

WITH FULL DISTORTION

  • Guest
Painkiller, Miracle Man & Holy Diver riffage comparison
« Reply #13 on: February 10, 2007, 05:52:44 PM »
Thats an Awesome AND FAN$%&#GINTASTIC Contribution
thanks, king of the comparison CLips
ahahahahahahahahahahah
 :shock:  From Hell!!!!
i loved the clips.
i just have one Little Silly Doubt.
can you do the same clip, or just answer my question, with a slightly modd?
add some Blastpicking.. Like the song Immortal-Mountains Of Might,Or Marduk-sulphur Souls etc
i love my Nailbomb, the only problem is that it doesn´t get that tight for Blastpicking(Tremolo picking,or speedpicking.i like to call it Blastpicking)
but it fits my bill for the whole rest of it.
Q:)
i would have to change it from my charvel to my Fender.
Q:P
JP

gwEm

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 7456
    • http://www.preromanbritain.com/gwem
Painkiller, Miracle Man & Holy Diver riffage comparison
« Reply #14 on: February 13, 2007, 04:33:37 PM »
great contribution indeed!

subtle difference as everyone noted, but important ones considering the price of the pickups.

clean comparision would also be helpful.

thanks for this post :) :) :)
Quote from: AndyR
you wouldn't use the meat knife on crusty bread but, equally, the serrated knife and straight edge knife aren't going to go through raw meat as quickly