New Guns n' Roses Songs

[TomW]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M--K9Ks_fIg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-DKg7T_76Y

What do you think? I like the first one but I'm not too impressed by the other.

[genocidal tendencies]

First one's ok, second one's just fussy and awkward. There's just no point in this kind of stuff existing.

[matteo]

axl still got some lungs tho :o

worth the wait though ?????????

[Muzzzz]

Bloody oath, when the hell are they going to release Chinese Democracy!!?? I think it has the world record for the most expensive album ever made, and it'll probably be shite anyway.

Slash = GnR

therefore,

No Slash = No GnR

[Ratrod]

Actually it has the world record for the most expensive album never made.

And if Slash and Duff aren't in it, it's not Guns n' Roses IMHO.

The songs are a far cry from Appetite, innit.

[blue]

The songs are a far cry from Appetite, innit.

yeah, but in fairness, that WAS 20 years ago.  although some of these songs have been knocking about nearly as long!!

i saw the original Guns live, and Axl's voice was a weak point, great at the start of the show but totally buggered by half way through.  saw the new Guns last summer, and while the show as a whole was a self indulgent mess, his voice was incredible!  and it sounds fabulous on the first of those clips.

[MDV]

I wanted to hate it, but dont, quite. But considering each song took 1.3 yeras to write, I'm decidedly unimpressed.

Thats about 2000 hours per minute of music, given 6 min songs. It reeks of insecurity that it wouldnt be well recieved, rather than any creative genius.

[JJretroTONEGOD]

I don't like both of the songs. 1st reason: Axle's voice is clearly using a pitch corrector on both tracks,  :roll:  2nd reason: it's not really GnR with more than 50% of the original band missing.  PDT_038