Username: Password:

Author Topic: Tiny Terror ... again  (Read 4771 times)

Oli

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 915
Tiny Terror ... again
« on: September 24, 2007, 11:51:01 PM »
So over the last couple of weeks, i've tested out the Tiny Terror in a couple of the guitar shops in Denmark st, and thought that i'd report back with my findings.

Firstly, being a metal player myself, i was most concerned about the amount/quality of gain on tap, but also how the cleans are (i'm not gonna claim that i play some jazz and blues though :P). Guitars used were a Jackson 6 string, tuned to E, seymour duncan passive pups, and a Jackson 'cow' sig 7 string model, with an active EMG, probably the 81. Both guitars were plugged straight into the amp, and each time the amp drove a 4x12.

The 6 string sounded really nice and meaty, but not over the top. The settings were (roughly), 7watts/volume:9'o'clock/eq:12'o'clock/gain: 4'o'clock. If you turned the amp up more, you obviously got some more gain out of it, but for a moderate bedroom practise, 9 'o'clock on the volume was _plenty_ loud enough. With a clean boost infront, i have no doubt that it'd satisfy even the most gain-hungry of players :) The amp cleaned up really nicely to a glassy clean, but you could take the edge off it and more by tweaking the single eq control. The 15w setting seemed to be more useful for playing clean, not really much difference with the gain dialled in.

The 7 string was the 'acid test' for me, being a big fan of my 7 string, it had to handle the extra string well. Well, with the EMG pickup (not my pickup of choice, but it was the only 7 stringer they had in the shop), it had really balls and depth. Sounded great no matter where the controls were on the amp. Plenty of gain with it to achieve a nice doom tone, roll the EQ back to get a more 'old-school' sound to it. Cleaned up reasonably well, although the low B wasn't quite as crystal as it could have been, but i think with more tweaking (and perhaps the presence of a neck pickup!), it'd handle it superbly :)

To conclude:

Does it sound good? Yes
Enough gain for metal? Yes
Loud enough? Yes
Will I be buying one when I shift my Laney? Most certainly Yes :)

For the lions share of 300 quid, you can't really go wrong with this cracking little fella :)

Point to note: from my reasonably limited experience with the amp, I got the impression that it would be very good for more rock and roll styles. As you rolled the gain back, when you got to about 1.30 or 2 'o'clock, it seemed to drop down to 'classic rock' territory quite sharply- metal regions were only in the last quarter of a turn or so.
Nailbomb, VHII, Warpig 7, MQ, Black Dog, 10th Anniversary

ailean

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1357
Tiny Terror ... again
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2007, 06:32:25 AM »
I just bought one of these suckers a week ago with a 1x12 Orange cab. It's so good I can't play it coz my wife keeps stealing it :)

It does clean up quite well but it's not as good as the clean channel on my peavey valveking, but that isn't a surprise

However I didn't buy it for clean, I bought it for gain. This amp is amazing. If you don't already own an Orange, check it out. I think every player could find space in their home for one of these.
Gibson LP std + Nailbomb set
Diezel VH4 & Orange Rockerverb 50

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Tiny Terror ... again
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2007, 08:49:16 AM »
Yep, totally agree.  My Matamp Little Rock is now an expensive door stop.

Orkestra

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 194
Tiny Terror ... again
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2007, 09:22:55 AM »
im selling one...

jt

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1575
Tiny Terror ... again
« Reply #4 on: September 25, 2007, 09:48:37 AM »
:D Yep have to agree the TT is a great little amp. Takes pedals well in front as well.

 :D  8)
God I could do with a Gin & Tonic !

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Tiny Terror ... again
« Reply #5 on: September 25, 2007, 10:36:12 AM »
Quote from: Twinfan
Yep, totally agree.  My Matamp Little Rock is now an expensive door stop.

Really?  Now that surprises me.  So the TT completely smokes the Little Rock?
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

WezV

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5838
    • http://wezvenables.co.uk
Tiny Terror ... again
« Reply #6 on: September 25, 2007, 10:59:27 AM »
from what twin fan has said the matamp has better cleans - personally i love it on the clean channel with a good booster pedal in front, still using that more than the drive channels.

Still havnt tried the TT properly

WezV

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5838
    • http://wezvenables.co.uk
Tiny Terror ... again
« Reply #7 on: September 25, 2007, 11:02:35 AM »
... although i have just lent my LR to a friend because he loved the overdrive so much and wanted to record with it and i know he had the option of using a TT as well.  be interested to know which one he ended up using to record with

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Tiny Terror ... again
« Reply #8 on: September 25, 2007, 11:14:07 AM »
OK, now I want a TT - but with Power Scaling (to use another of this week's buzzwords - or buzz-two-words).  7 watts is still too loud for me.
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Tiny Terror ... again
« Reply #9 on: September 25, 2007, 11:16:25 AM »
I agree with Wez - for cleans and low gain the Little Rock is great, and with a booster it has a great tone.  My problem with it though is that is has quite a loose bass.  There's just not enough definition for me.  The Tiny Terror is much tighter sounding and rocks better.  For indie-type stuff, the Little Rock is nicer sounding as it's a touch warmer.

The best comparison I can give is to compare the amps overall tone to Celestion speakers:

Little Rock = Greenback characteristics
Tiny Terror = G12H characteristcs

That's the best description I can give of the difference.

sgmypod

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3765
  • Truly bad since 1972
Tiny Terror ... again
« Reply #10 on: September 25, 2007, 11:34:06 AM »
mmmm makes me think should start looking at a TT...and 7watts too much makes me feel silly with my inhouse Prosonic
Autotune My Arse

Crawler,nailbomb & Ltd Ed Emeralds, apache, now riff raff..EX- N/bomb, IT, Mquee

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Tiny Terror ... again
« Reply #11 on: September 25, 2007, 12:05:48 PM »
Quote from: sgmypod
...and 7watts too much makes me feel silly with my inhouse Prosonic

It's true though, isn't it?  I have a 55 watt Rivera combo and the volume has never been above 1.  Obviously it's totally different if you gig, but for home use all that power is unnecessary.

I want something that, cranked, is no louder than the TV or hifi - and it seems you only need 1/4 or 1/2 watt to achieve that.  I've been reading about the Suhr Badger and Fargen MiniPlex, which sound fantastic, but they're big bucks.  It'd be great to see Power Scaling in some more affordable amps.
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

Brow

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2418
Tiny Terror ... again
« Reply #12 on: September 25, 2007, 12:12:50 PM »
Dave, I'm quite surprised to hear that your Little Rock is now a doorstop, I know you loved it when you 1st got it!

You say the bass is too loose for you? How are you running the EQ/Gain/Volume controls?

As for an amp that when cranked is no louder than the TV etc, has anyone tried the ZVex Nano head?
Selling lots of gear, enquire within!......

sgmypod

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3765
  • Truly bad since 1972
Tiny Terror ... again
« Reply #13 on: September 25, 2007, 12:25:05 PM »
yup is unnecessary...but is such a sweet amp.....mmm powerscalling time *L*
Autotune My Arse

Crawler,nailbomb & Ltd Ed Emeralds, apache, now riff raff..EX- N/bomb, IT, Mquee

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Tiny Terror ... again
« Reply #14 on: September 25, 2007, 12:27:55 PM »
Quote from: Brow
Dave, I'm quite surprised to hear that your Little Rock is now a doorstop, I know you loved it when you 1st got it!

You say the bass is too loose for you? How are you running the EQ/Gain/Volume controls?


I dabbled with loads of settings and couldn't quite get the "rock" tone I was after.  Great for blues and indie, but I just couldn't get it right for heavier stuff.

Quote from: Brow
As for an amp that when cranked is no louder than the TV etc, has anyone tried the ZVex Nano head?


Nope, but I feel the need to sometime.  However, I'll end up buying one I know  :roll: