Oh and I teach, not a bit of bother and I'm very against bringing back the cain/belt. That's not the answer.
steady on now, no-one's talking about killing! :lol:
(a) Sometimes it's too much bother to do anything with the trouble makers but not too much trouble to hassle the normal people.
(b) Our town centre (and shopping mall) has attempted to ban anybody in 'skater' style clothing (or with long hair), yet the chavs who seem to do all the shop lifting and leave the smell of cheap dope hanging in the air are not taken to task.
Grrr end of rant.
(a) agreed wholeheartedly. that's also why i'm against these retarded targets that brown and co. like to bring in. bring in targets that they have to catch a certain amount of criminals, and they just go after the easy targets rather than the difficult ones. not to mention, it's not like you can predict exactly how many crimes are going to be committed.
(b) wow, i hadn't heard that, that's ridiculous. I have long-ish hair, what are they going to do, ban me? are they going to ban it on girls too?
:? :x
any time i've seen skaters there, they haven't been doing any harm from what i've seen. i certainly haven't felt intimidated, as you certainly sometimes do with people who aren't dressed as skaters.
EDIT: the other thing i don't like is that often rules which are brought in to deal with a certain special circumstance are then in widespread use before long, once the public has got used to it and learns to tolerate it. for example, the "no liquid in bottles" rule (because of terrorism) is now frequently used by businesses like cinemas and clubs, as they want you to buy their drinks. that definitely helps us fight terrorism... :x