I'm generally against that kind of thing. The money has to come from somewhere, and I think the compensation culture of the US which is becoming more and more prevalent here doesn't really help anyone in the long run.
It's bad enough with parking attendants who are there solely to make money for their own wages (and not doing ANYTHING for the sake of the flow of traffic or easing obstruction problems).
I'm thinking of becoming a communist.
Roo
b0llocks!
if someone spills bleach in your eyes or whatever, you're entitled to compensation
Someone pours bleach in your eyes, I agree, you are entitled to compensation from them, and they should be held criminally responsible.
You fall off a stepladder because you neglected to secure it properly and didn't make sure it was level, you are a fool and have no-one to blame but yourself.
It's completely context dependent, and while it's difficult in some cases to apportion blame or not, the increasing prevalence of compensation culture is swaying the balance more towards the notion that "if anything bad happens, it MUST have been someone's fault, and I should gain monetarily from it".
With that said, I wish I'd got the details of the guy who knocked me off my bike a year and a bit ago. I ended up with fairly major surgery, considerable extra commuting cost due to not being able to drive when I took on my new job, not being able to play guitar for a few months, so no band... It was entirely his fault, because he had been cycling on the pavement, and pulled out onto the road (where I was cycling in the same direction) without looking, without signalling, and directly in front of me. I think I probably would want to take legal action against him for that, because it was totally negligent, and blame could be directly apportioned (like the bleach example you gave, gwEm).
What I object to the most is that the companies who advertise about this ('you could be entitled to money!') never, ever, EVER say where that money comes from. Some of the examples they have are really poor - where people did stupid things, or didn't take care, or GENUINE accidents that really couldn't reasonably have been avoided. In those cases, I think compensation companies do a great public disservice by their fostering of the opinion that the 'victim' is always 'entitled' to compensation.
/rant
Roo