Ozzy just wants everyone to have a fair share, which I think is fair enough.
Ozzy left (or was kicked out of) the band, Tony kept it going. Through some very tough times, it must be said, while Ozzy was raking in the cash from his (mostly second-rate) solo career.
Ozzy = rolling in money. Tony = NOT. But the Ozz man wants half of it anyway.
I would imagine Ozzy still gets royalties from the albums he was on. Why should he get a single penny from all the albums (and associated merchandise) recorded with Dio, Tony Martin etc (even if
"(the band's) popularity plummeted during his absence" :roll: )?
And note that Ozzy (aka Sharon) is suing for a
FIFTY percent interest. What about Bill and Geezer? Of course, rhythm sections are irrelevant - as Lee Kerslake and Bob Daisley could tell us. :x
Sharon is an evil $%&#ing monster. And if Ozzy wasn't such a vegetable he might realise it. Stupid old tw@t.