I generally avoid absolutes, I've stated opinions and asked questions. Indeed, there is only one real statement (there are facts, but facts can be disputed) in the post you've quoted is the last line, which is clearly an opinion, not an absolute, and therefore open for discussion.
As opposed to
Alright, lets cut to the chase - unless you were in the bar watching what happened (and listening to it) or in the court for the trial you cant possibly cast a judgment on it. That clear enough?
which leaves nothing to discuss except the logic of the statement (and looking at it again, maybe the internal consistency of the statement, but heh). It is also delivered in a highly confrontational style. I'm sorry if it offends you that someone would dare to question you, but again, it is a discussion board, a place to discuss, and one of the things that make discussion forums work is that people respect other people's right to opinions that aren't inherently offensive. If we can't accept that then we may as well all pack up and go home.
And anyway, what is so wrong with questionning a jury's decision? They're fallable humans, and on occasion get things wrong>
