So in the statement "Motorists very rarely drive through red lights" are you referring to "all motorists", "the majority of motorists", or even "23% of motorists?
This is what I call a reasonable discussion.
Oh come on.
Many motorists run red lights,
just after they've changed from amber. Motorists in this country
never completely ignore red lights - as if they don't even apply to them - and just cruise through 15 seconds after the light has changed, as people are crossing the road. But some (SOME!!!) cyclists do exactly that.
I don't know the percentages and neither do you, but it's more cyclists than it is motorists, you bloody well know that it happens, and it happens frequently. Stop denying facts.
:|
Look, I don't know what I've said to upset you so much. Mate.
I'm talking about situations where a pedestrian - maybe me - is trying to cross a road, the big round light is red and the little man is green. A cyclist - NOT YOU - chooses to ignore said red light and obstruct the path of said pedestrian in a potentially dangerous manner. Doesn't the pedestrian have every right to be annoyed?
How exactly am I in the wrong here?