I've kept out of this one until now, waited until there was more info etc but..
Can't say I disagree Dave..
With those kind of prices (granted its been reduced but just proves deals are there to be the had for those who look) on a full fat 24, it's really a no brainer. especially comparing US hardware to the Offshore hardware that seems to be in use on the S2..
Leave multiple price points to Fender and Gibson. PRS get back to building high end and custom guitars please.
there's a letter in this months guitarist where some bloke mentions how the "SE" logo on the SE range is hugely demeaning to those on a tighter budget. He then goes on to complain about how the backplate on the S2 is non recessed, and other bits and pieces, basically why it isn't exactly the same as a "full fat" PRS but cheaper.
eh?
Whats with the sense of entitlement virtually everyone has these days? I get that budgets are tight at the moment, and not everyone can afford a full fat PRS, but if you don't like the SE logo then don't buy one. They're fine guitars, but they're aimed at a certain price point and no company is going to smoke and mirror a budget range so it's indistinguishable from the high end range.
I don't get annoyed because the 370Z, which is seen as somewhat of a little brother to the Nissan GTR and is a little more in my price range (actually it's not, but it's much more realistic), doesn't have a GTR logo on it and doesn't have the performance of a GTR for a fraction of the price. Do i feel demeaned and insulted by Nissan for not making the GTR available to me personally for much less money? No, because what it costs is what it costs and i can't afford that so tough. In fact I'm rather glad there's a 370Z which in a few years will be a bargain second hand and will give a considerable performance to quid ratio.
Course if how the guitar performs matters less than whats on the headstock, thats a whole other kettle of fish.