I've received some criticism from two fellow guitar players recently about the whole guitar collection thing. Both of them are friends but pointed out that they were slightly miffed/aggrieved/upset that I had so many guitars that spent most of their time just sat around in cases. Guitars are meant to be played, apparently. My arguement was that they were there if I needed them and I like the fact that I have a Tele/Strat/Les Paul/SG etc.
So where do you guys stand? Should the average guy or gal just have a few guitars that suit them and are played a lot, or is it a free world and you can own play/not play what you like?
OK, as an owner of 22 guitars I readily admit that I have far too many :)
I never intended to "collect" & for years I got by with 4-5 guitars. But when I got my custom Jackson I decided to work towards having 6 really nice guitars that covered all my requirements & get rid of my older guitars. Then I realised that none of the guitars I wanted to sell were worth anything so I might as well keep them, then I realised that my 6 planned guitars didn't include a bass or a 12-string, then I decided I wanted a nice Les Paul, then I realised I didn't have anything with single coils etc etc etc...
"Surely you don't need so many" is what non-players typically say. Well, strictly speaking I don't
need more than one - in fact I don't need
any guitars :) - it's a fatuous argument IMO: people don't
need wardrobes full of shoes & fashionable clothes, racks of DVDs/videos, games consoles, flat-screen TVs, PCs, foreign holidays, cameras, ipods, books, jewellery, ornaments, or any other bric-a-brac - but life would be pretty damn dull without them.
I have a demanding, stressful job, for which I am paid well enough to indulge my hobby while still providing for my family. Anyone who thinks I don't deserve to have the guitars I have is just jealous & can p*ss off...