Username: Password:

Author Topic: Krank Rev vs. Rivera KR-100  (Read 9056 times)

rimsky

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Krank Rev vs. Rivera KR-100
« Reply #15 on: November 22, 2008, 06:36:51 PM »
yup,you could get the "idea" of the sound from youtube vids..nothin more.

hunter

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5262
    • http://www.myspace.com/christophjaeger
Re: Krank Rev vs. Rivera KR-100
« Reply #16 on: November 22, 2008, 10:00:00 PM »
Obvious choice would be a Marshall, wouldn't it?

Or what about a Bogner XTC?

Personally I am no big fan of Riveras (once owned a Knucklehead), but would take one over a Krank.
Tweaker's Paradise - Player's nightmare.

broken cord

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 560
Re: Krank Rev vs. Rivera KR-100
« Reply #17 on: November 23, 2008, 03:37:28 AM »
I'll have to back Jonny up here with a nod towards the Koch. I only have the Koch Studiotone, which is only
18-20 watts but is has a unique sound. However, I still like my 65 Amps London 18 , which has a Marshall sounding side and a AC30 sounding side: Rock versatile but not brutal.
« Last Edit: November 23, 2008, 03:43:54 PM by broken cord »
Warpig/Mississippi Queen
Calibrated Painkillers
Nailbombs

the_bleeding

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 404
Re: Krank Rev vs. Rivera KR-100
« Reply #18 on: November 23, 2008, 03:46:18 AM »
its funny because down and mastodon use jcm800 and jcm900's.

Bloodmountain however was done with mesas.

For remission, lifesblood and leviathan, it was just a tubescreamer into a jcm800. Thats IT.
my maxon OD 808 really DOES make poop sound good

Jonny

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2890
  • Seven-String Financial Analyst in Training
Re: Krank Rev vs. Rivera KR-100
« Reply #19 on: November 23, 2008, 12:16:24 PM »
Obvious choice would be a Marshall, wouldn't it?

Or what about a Bogner XTC?

Personally I am no big fan of Riveras (once owned a Knucklehead), but would take one over a Krank.
Why didn't you like the Knucklehead, hunter? Too heavy?
"Would you like some lemon oil?"
"Oh, no thanks, I don't eat fruit."

rimsky

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Krank Rev vs. Rivera KR-100
« Reply #20 on: November 23, 2008, 12:23:52 PM »
Obvious choice would be a Marshall, wouldn't it?

Or what about a Bogner XTC?

Personally I am no big fan of Riveras (once owned a Knucklehead), but would take one over a Krank.

Yep,It would be great if you'll share some details :)

hunter

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5262
    • http://www.myspace.com/christophjaeger
Re: Krank Rev vs. Rivera KR-100
« Reply #21 on: November 23, 2008, 11:07:09 PM »
It was too tight and harsh in the high frequencies. I kept getting buzzing ears after rehearsal, but had the feeling I hadn't heard myself well while playing.

It's just in the face, not in the chest/stomach, as I prefer...
Tweaker's Paradise - Player's nightmare.

Jonny

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2890
  • Seven-String Financial Analyst in Training
Re: Krank Rev vs. Rivera KR-100
« Reply #22 on: November 23, 2008, 11:41:41 PM »
It's just in the face, not in the chest/stomach, as I prefer...
:lol:
"Would you like some lemon oil?"
"Oh, no thanks, I don't eat fruit."

MDV

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 6945
  • If it sounds good it IS good
Re: Krank Rev vs. Rivera KR-100
« Reply #23 on: November 24, 2008, 08:07:40 AM »
It's just in the face, not in the chest/stomach, as I prefer...
:lol:

And the bar lowers further still

Good work that man!!

:lol:

rimsky

  • Junior Flyweight
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Krank Rev vs. Rivera KR-100
« Reply #24 on: November 25, 2008, 10:30:55 AM »
It's just in the face, not in the chest/stomach, as I prefer...

What's about Rivera M-100(S-120)?