Username: Password:

Author Topic: Speaking of Gibson!  (Read 4717 times)

Lew

  • Guest
Speaking of Gibson!
« on: April 09, 2009, 02:29:05 AM »

Afghan Dave

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3315
Re: Speaking of Gibson!
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2009, 05:11:54 AM »
Oh.. I've just been a little sick.. :( :? Mmm Nasty..
"There's more knowledge on these boards than there are necks under PhillyQ's bed"

ailean

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1357
Re: Speaking of Gibson!
« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2009, 06:14:03 AM »
I like Gibson, but I'm not a fanboy, that is just not right.
Gibson LP std + Nailbomb set
Diezel VH4 & Orange Rockerverb 50

MrBump

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3405
  • Essex! Home of the Brave!!!
    • This Is Essex
Re: Speaking of Gibson!
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2009, 06:49:08 AM »
... I don't know... There's something about it that appeals to me, somehow.

Not sure about the scratchplate though.
BKPs Past and Present - Nailbombs, Mules, Blackguard Flat 50's, VHII's & Trilogy Suite with Neck & Bridge Baseplates!

James C

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 449
Re: Speaking of Gibson!
« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2009, 07:40:33 AM »
Someone needs to get fired for that guitar.......unless they came up with the autumn burst carve top SG thats also a limited edition, because that is nice.
Formerly "ManOnTheEdge"

Using a Nailbomb 7 Set in Ibanez RG7321

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Re: Speaking of Gibson!
« Reply #5 on: April 09, 2009, 07:48:55 AM »
I posted a pic of that in this thread a few days ago:

http://bareknucklepickups.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=16779.0

I think it's horrible, a typical example of Gibson getting something wrong.  All they've done is morph an SG body shape (with a nod to a Hamer Phantom, probably entirely by accident).  Then they've left the headstock unchanged so it doesn't match the body at all, spent 5 seconds designing a silly scratchplate, then painted it a ridiculous colour.

But soundwise, does it do anything new?  498T and 490R pickups, thin mahogany body, set mahogany neck... it's just an SG with 2 extra frets and an ebony board.
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

dheim

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1945
  • DON'TPANIC!
Re: Speaking of Gibson!
« Reply #6 on: April 09, 2009, 09:03:51 AM »
I posted a pic of that in this thread a few days ago:

http://bareknucklepickups.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=16779.0

I think it's horrible, a typical example of Gibson getting something wrong.  All they've done is morph an SG body shape (with a nod to a Hamer Phantom, probably entirely by accident).  Then they've left the headstock unchanged so it doesn't match the body at all, spent 5 seconds designing a silly scratchplate, then painted it a ridiculous colour.

But soundwise, does it do anything new?  498T and 490R pickups, thin mahogany body, set mahogany neck... it's just an SG with 2 extra frets and an ebony board.

exactly.
a body shape in between SG and some 80s superstrat design with a normal headstock that looks completely out of place, and for the scratchplate they asked a child to draw something "metal"... maybe without that plate and painted black (like sir jagger would suggest at this point) it could look just ugly. this way it looks awful.
Mule, MQ, Stockholm, CS, RY, MM, PK, ANB, CNB, AWP, CWP, PiG90...

too many? ;)

Madiac

  • Bantamweight
  • **
  • Posts: 208
Re: Speaking of Gibson!
« Reply #7 on: April 09, 2009, 10:01:23 AM »
Like Philly said... the biggest problem with that design is that the headstock looks way out of place with that body shape. Almost as taking a strat and putting  gibson headstock on.
It did appeal in a certain way, but the headstock compared to the body is the worst part, and the horns look wrong...
Feline Gothic Warpig - Alnico Warpig set

sgmypod

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3765
  • Truly bad since 1972
Re: Speaking of Gibson!
« Reply #8 on: April 09, 2009, 10:11:15 AM »
I kinda like the tackyness of that
Autotune My Arse

Crawler,nailbomb & Ltd Ed Emeralds, apache, now riff raff..EX- N/bomb, IT, Mquee

Lew

  • Guest
Re: Speaking of Gibson!
« Reply #9 on: April 09, 2009, 10:57:21 AM »
I posted a pic of that in this thread a few days ago:

http://bareknucklepickups.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=16779.0

I think it's horrible, a typical example of Gibson getting something wrong.  All they've done is morph an SG body shape (with a nod to a Hamer Phantom, probably entirely by accident).  Then they've left the headstock unchanged so it doesn't match the body at all, spent 5 seconds designing a silly scratchplate, then painted it a ridiculous colour.

But soundwise, does it do anything new?  498T and 490R pickups, thin mahogany body, set mahogany neck... it's just an SG with 2 extra frets and an ebony board.

oops didn't see the thread  :shock:

blue

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2212
    • http://www.bebo.com/blue1million
Re: Speaking of Gibson!
« Reply #10 on: April 09, 2009, 11:15:00 AM »
i like it ok.  if they do another sg or les paul they get criticised, if they do something a bit different it's just not gibson.  they can't really win, can they?

i think the point of the guitar of the week thing is to try out lots of different ideas in small runs to see what works and what doesn't.  many will be forgotten, or derided, but some will be classics, and may even become production models.  i like the whole concept.
cry HAVOC!! and let slip the pigs of war!!!

Dmoney

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3577
Re: Speaking of Gibson!
« Reply #11 on: April 09, 2009, 11:47:09 AM »
anyone who buys that needs to sort their life out

sgmypod

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 3765
  • Truly bad since 1972
Re: Speaking of Gibson!
« Reply #12 on: April 09, 2009, 11:51:54 AM »
cool life sorting time
Autotune My Arse

Crawler,nailbomb & Ltd Ed Emeralds, apache, now riff raff..EX- N/bomb, IT, Mquee

dheim

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1945
  • DON'TPANIC!
Re: Speaking of Gibson!
« Reply #13 on: April 09, 2009, 12:07:26 PM »
i like it ok.  if they do another sg or les paul they get criticised, if they do something a bit different it's just not gibson.  they can't really win, can they?

i think the point of the guitar of the week thing is to try out lots of different ideas in small runs to see what works and what doesn't.  many will be forgotten, or derided, but some will be classics, and may even become production models.  i like the whole concept.

i agree that those limited runs can be fun, but i can't see a future for this particular model... i'm not fond of weird shapes even if i don't limit design options just to the usual LP/SG/strat/RG shapes... i just think that a new shape must be really eye-catching or comfortable to become a new standard... this is not the case for this "stratized" SG. the idea is not bad per se, but they should have worked it a bit deeper than just prolonging a horn and mounting a bat-winged pickguard on an otherwise normal SG.
Mule, MQ, Stockholm, CS, RY, MM, PK, ANB, CNB, AWP, CWP, PiG90...

too many? ;)

Roobubba

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 2786
Re: Speaking of Gibson!
« Reply #14 on: April 09, 2009, 12:32:07 PM »
Quick Robin! To the Bat-studio!