All that mumbo-jumbo with "unevenly hand wound, thus giving clearer highs"-blah and whatnot is just pure bullshiteee.
Wrong, with epirical evidence to back it up.
Those pups are in no way a) better
Hmmm ... arguing a something totally subjective with your own subjective/biased opinion. While 'better' in terms of
sonics is defintiely subjective, 'better' in terms of
construction is not. So, in that regard, objectively speaking, BKs
are better than a mass-produced made-to-cost pickup.
or b) much different than any bog-standard Seymour, DiMarzio or whatever if you look for the right model.
This is essentially correct. There are so many ways you can make a pickup. However, this statement is pretty ignorant! I wonder if this guy feels the same way about
everything -- all beers are the same, all cars are the same, all guitars are the same? (Hmm, maybe he's one of those commune-loving hippies? :) )
And that for less than half the price.
Wrong again. Even in the US, a Duncan is more than half the cost of a BK.
Analysis -- This guy is obviously a troll, and on better forums, would be warned and then outright banned for trolling. I'm not entirely sure why this thread was even started, it seems a bit like deliberate whacking of the hornet's nest to me. The original poster's ingorance is staggering, however -- even for the internet!