Username: Password:

Author Topic: I've just bought a 1962 SG Standard for £1299!  (Read 19071 times)

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Re: I've just bought a 1962 SG Standard for £1299!
« Reply #45 on: February 26, 2010, 04:08:57 PM »
No-one is getting the Tele!

Played the Nags Head last week mate, where were you??????
« Last Edit: February 26, 2010, 04:17:59 PM by Twinfan »

PPPMAT

  • Featherweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 272
Re: I've just bought a 1962 SG Standard for £1299!
« Reply #46 on: February 26, 2010, 04:37:37 PM »
Looks great Dave - a nice find. I'm going to try out a CS SG in a week or two and see if it does what I need it to. I look forward to some clips  :P

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Re: I've just bought a 1962 SG Standard for £1299!
« Reply #47 on: February 26, 2010, 07:34:54 PM »
Hmm.  Interesting.

Closer inspection reveals a skinny nut width, plus a six digit serial (not 5 digit as advertised).  I reckon it's a '65 not a '62.

Decisions decisions.......

Ian Price

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 4571
Re: I've just bought a 1962 SG Standard for £1299!
« Reply #48 on: February 26, 2010, 07:36:45 PM »
Hmm.  Interesting.

Closer inspection reveals a skinny nut width, plus a six digit serial (not 5 digit as advertised).  I reckon it's a '65 not a '62.

Decisions decisions.......

Ask for a discount!

EDIT - alternatively, don't send it back or pay for it. When they ask for the '62 back you should say something along the lines of "what '62?"  :lol:
I think I hate being indecisive.

shobet

  • Welterweight
  • ****
  • Posts: 1582
  • Look into my eye...
    • http://www.dusksky.com
Re: I've just bought a 1962 SG Standard for £1299!
« Reply #49 on: February 26, 2010, 07:48:05 PM »
How does it play?
There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary.
Those who do and those who do not.

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Re: I've just bought a 1962 SG Standard for £1299!
« Reply #50 on: February 26, 2010, 08:13:34 PM »
It plays great!  The thinner width nut means it's slightly cramped compared to my usual guitars, but it's slick as a slick thing and feels great.  Nice and vibrant, you can feel the body vibrate when you play.  Pickups are OK, but lacking in some 'zing'.

It's been rewired very professionally with top spec CTS pots and orange drop caps, plus a Switchcraft jack.  Exactly what I was going to use, so that's pretty cool!

Just about to pull the pickups and see what the routes are like.

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Re: I've just bought a 1962 SG Standard for £1299!
« Reply #51 on: February 26, 2010, 09:00:30 PM »
Closer inspection reveals a skinny nut width, plus a six digit serial (not 5 digit as advertised).  I reckon it's a '65 not a '62.

Just out of curiosity, what's the serial number?  My Melody Maker's 260007.
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Re: I've just bought a 1962 SG Standard for £1299!
« Reply #52 on: February 26, 2010, 10:30:33 PM »
The serial number is "509242" I think, although the last number is very hard to read.

According to this site:  http://home.provide.net/~cfh/gibson.html#serial that makes it a '65 or a '68, and given that it has the small scratchplate (not the batwing, or evidence of ever having one) it must be a '65.  The pickup routes are fine except for some extra home-done style expansion of the pickup leg areas.  To accommodate some different 'buckers at some point I think.

Interesting guitar...

hunter

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5262
    • http://www.myspace.com/christophjaeger
Re: I've just bought a 1962 SG Standard for £1299!
« Reply #53 on: February 27, 2010, 06:29:25 AM »
Neck breaks are overrated. It didn't change anything on my Hamer Sunburst. As long as it's been glued well and even more so if the break is behind the nut. As long as it holds and transfers the vibrations it will make no difference.

I'm sure it's a great guitar, congrats!
Tweaker's Paradise - Player's nightmare.

Tellboy

  • Lightweight
  • ***
  • Posts: 988
Re: I've just bought a 1962 SG Standard for £1299!
« Reply #54 on: February 27, 2010, 10:41:05 AM »
The serial number is "509242" I think, although the last number is very hard to read.

Like most guitars around this era the serial numbers can seem to be confusing. Is the last number definitely part of the serial - presumably (using the info on the site) if you assumed it was a 5 figure serial, it would date it as a 62. But as you have mentioned the narrow nut width it does seem to point to 65.

With my SG unfortunately I 'erased' the serial when I refinished it but did write it down somewhere - unfortunately I can't find it a the moment but remember it was a 5 figure number beginning with 6 which confirms it as a 64 - the neck is also much chunkier than my 61 reissue.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2010, 10:48:01 AM by Tellboy »
John Suhr - "Practice cures most tone issues"
Crawler,Mule,Apache,Piledriver,Bl. Guard,Cold Sweat

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Re: I've just bought a 1962 SG Standard for £1299!
« Reply #55 on: February 27, 2010, 01:45:00 PM »
The 3rd and 4th digits line up exactly with the middle of the headstock, so I'm sure it's a six figure number.  Plus the thinnner nut, makes it a '65 to me.

I'm thinking I'm going to keep it and throw on the best hardware I can get hold of.  Then play the snot out of it at 'DC gigs!

Philly Q

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 18109
Re: I've just bought a 1962 SG Standard for £1299!
« Reply #56 on: February 27, 2010, 01:51:25 PM »
I'm thinking I'm going to keep it and throw on the best hardware I can get hold of. 

Does that mean you're going in search of authentic vintage hardware?  Or just decent new stuff?
BKPs I've Got:  RR, BKP-91, ITs, VHII, CS set, Emeralds
BKPs I Had:  RY+Abraxas, Crawlers, BD+SM

Twinfan

  • Light Heavyweight
  • ******
  • Posts: 10528
Re: I've just bought a 1962 SG Standard for £1299!
« Reply #57 on: February 27, 2010, 02:18:40 PM »
Decent new stuff - I'm not paying for old cr@p!

I think TonePros everything should do the trick?  Tuners, ABR-1 bridge and posts, plus a tailpiece and posts.

Or what about Pigtail?  Any other makes I should look at?

HTH AMPS

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 5649
    • HTH AMPS
Re: I've just bought a 1962 SG Standard for £1299!
« Reply #58 on: February 27, 2010, 02:28:35 PM »
Decent new stuff - I'm not paying for old cr@p!

I think TonePros everything should do the trick?  Tuners, ABR-1 bridge and posts, plus a tailpiece and posts.

Or what about Pigtail?  Any other makes I should look at?

DMC and Fake58 - stay away from Pigtail, heard lots of horror stories about people ordering, never getting anything and the guy wouldn't respond to emails.

I've personally dealt with Fake58 and they were very fast in getting the goods out (AND they're a UK company).


gwEm

  • Middleweight
  • *****
  • Posts: 7456
    • http://www.preromanbritain.com/gwem
Re: I've just bought a 1962 SG Standard for £1299!
« Reply #59 on: February 27, 2010, 03:27:30 PM »
Decent new stuff - I'm not paying for old cr@p!

I think TonePros everything should do the trick?  Tuners, ABR-1 bridge and posts, plus a tailpiece and posts.

Or what about Pigtail?  Any other makes I should look at?

DMC and Fake58 - stay away from Pigtail, heard lots of horror stories about people ordering, never getting anything and the guy wouldn't respond to emails.

I've personally dealt with Fake58 and they were very fast in getting the goods out (AND they're a UK company).

:( i have a bridge on order from pigtail at the moment
Quote from: AndyR
you wouldn't use the meat knife on crusty bread but, equally, the serrated knife and straight edge knife aren't going to go through raw meat as quickly